Movement along faults in Earth’s crust can be sudden and jarring. It can occur more gradually over thousands of years. Any kind of movement along a fault might affect the stresses and other factors that contribute to subsequent movements.
Scientists have developed computational physics-based models that simulate sequences of earthquakes and non-earthquake-related movement, to better understand these dynamic fault zone processes. These simulations could help uncover new insights into earthquakes. This includes factors that affect their timing, location, duration, and magnitude. These models are becoming more advanced and detailed. Researchers face an increased need to verify the underlying numerical code to ensure the simulations’ credibility.
In contrast to model validation, code verification involves setting computational benchmarks. To test the reliability and ability of simulations to accurately represent conceptual understanding of earthquake behavior. Jiang et al report on international community–driven efforts to compare and verify the different numerical codes underlying simulations of fault zone processes. Building on previous efforts, the researchers developed two new 3D benchmark problems for testing and comparing different numerical codes. Both benchmarks require movement simulation along a fault embedded in a 3D space with certain physical characteristics.
Earthquake scientists from around the world used the benchmarks to test a suite of simulations of fault zone processes. These efforts provided assurance as to the accuracy of the simulations. The simulations accurately reproduced earthquake duration, total movement, maximum speed and stress change on faults.
Discrepancies between some simulations were also apparent. Computational models using different spatial sizes and resolutions varied in their simulations of how earthquakes begin and grow.
